Course Evaluation and Learning Assessment

A Stick and A Snake: Polyvagal Theory and Complex Traumatization

Instructor:

Dr. Ling Lam

Location: Recorded webinar

CE Credits/Units: 2

Accrediting Agencies: APA, ASWB, & NBCC

Full Name *

Email Address *

Street Address

City

State/Province

ZIP / Postal Code

Country

License Type and Number *

1 Instructor for this workshop

Instruction

Learning Objectives:

Increase understanding of the body’s response to trauma.
Learn how Polyvagal Theory provides a neurophysiological framework for understanding how early attachment experiences have shaped the brains and arousal capacity for former and current foster youth.
Increase awareness of how group membership, based on social identities, can create traumatic stress for former and current foster youth.
Learn strategies for how to best help clients improve affect regulation skills and their self-concept.

Instructions: Complete every applicable question. This information is REQUIRED in order to give you your CE credit. For the following questions, mark an X under the number that corresponds to your answer.

Learning Objective Objective 1 was met *Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeObjective 1. Increase understanding of the body’s response to trauma.

Learning Objective 2 was met *Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeObjective 2. Learn how Polyvagal Theory provides a neurophysiological framework for understanding how early attachment experiences have shaped the brains and arousal capacity for former and current foster youth.

Learning Objective 3 was met *Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeObjective 3. Increase awareness of how group membership, based on social identities, can create traumatic stress for former and current foster youth.

Learning Objective 4 was met *Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeObjective 4. Learn strategies for how to best help clients improve affect regulation skills and their self-concept.

Instructor: Dr. Ling Lam

Professional & Ethical Issues

Presenter (or program chair, etc.) made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following:

Requirements for successful completion of activity *YesNo

Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest) *YesNo

Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest *YesNo

Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.) *YesNo

Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks? *YesNo

Setting

The length of time to complete the course matches the number of CE credits awarded for the course. *Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree

Learning

Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered. *Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree or DisagreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree

Narrative Questions

What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?

What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?

What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?

What was the total length of time it took you to complete this course (in hours and minutes)?